1. Mauritius and Similar Jurisdictions
Mauritius
Seychelles
Botswana
Namibia
Some Caribbean Commonwealth countries (e.g., Trinidad and Tobago, Jamaica — though with limitations)
In these jurisdictions, police may enter a temporary charge before a magistrate while they complete their investigations.
2. United Kingdom
In England and Wales, the concept of a provisional charge does not exist in the same way.
The police may arrest a person on reasonable suspicion.
The suspect can be detained and questioned (usually up to 24–96 hours, depending on the offence).
- The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) then decides whether to charge formally.If there is insufficient evidence, the person must be released — there is no provisional charge pending investigation.
Thus, the UK system gives the prosecution (not the police) the power to charge, ensuring checks on police authority.
3. France and Civil Law Countries
The public prosecutor (Procureur) or investigating judge (Juge d’instruction) supervises the investigation.
A suspect may be placed under judicial investigation (mise en examen), which is similar but more judicially controlled than the Mauritian provisional charge.
Detention or bail is tightly regulated by the judge, not the police.
So, in civil law countries, the process is more structured and rights-based.
4. United States
In the U.S., after arrest:
The police must bring the suspect before a judge within 48 hours.
- The prosecutor must file a formal charge (complaint or indictment) right away.There is no concept of a provisional charge — if there’s insufficient evidence, the person must be released.However, “preliminary hearings” exist, where the court determines if there is probable cause to proceed with prosecution.
5. India and Other Commonwealth States
6. Summary Comparison Table
| Region / Country | Provisional Charge Exists? | Authority Controlling Process | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mauritius | Yes | Police + Magistrate + DPP | Temporary; subject to DPP decision |
| Seychelles | Yes | Police + Court | Similar to Mauritius |
| UK | No | CPS | Only formal charge after evidence |
| France | No | Investigating Judge | Judicial investigation replaces it |
| USA | No | Prosecutor | Requires immediate formal charge |
| India | No | Police + Magistrate | FIR system and charge sheet later |
| Botswana, Namibia | Yes | Police + Court | Common-law adaptation |
7. Why Mauritius Retained It
Mauritius kept the provisional charge because:
It allows the police to act swiftly when serious crimes occur and evidence is still being gathered.
- It provides a legal basis for detention during ongoing investigations.However, it is increasingly seen as outdated and in conflict with human rights norms, especially the presumption of innocence and the right to liberty.
8. Global Trend
Modern legal systems are moving away from the provisional charge model, toward:
Stronger judicial oversight
Faster prosecutorial review
Protection of suspects’ rights
Mauritius is thus under pressure for reform, to align with international human rights standards such as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
Yes
No